Treating a Rat With Respiratory Issues

The first thing about treating a rat is to know what symptoms you’re looking for. I’m going to focus just on respiratory infections in rats.

Symptoms of a Respiratory Infection

  • Labored Breathing
  • Wheezing
  • Sneezing
  • Lack of appetite
  • Gurgling in chest
  • Porphyrin around nose (Porphyrin looks like blood, but in reality, it’s just rat mucus)

The next thing you need to know is what kinds of medicine will treat a rat. A respiratory infection in a rat is bacterial which will need antibiotics.

Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections in Rats

  • Tylan (the powdered form of tylosin)
  • Tetracycline
  • Cefadroxil (for secondary infections – best used in combination with Gentocin)
  • Chlorampenicol
  • Baytril (enrofloxacin)
  • Doxycycline
  • Baytril and Doxycycline in combination
  • Gentocin in combination with Cefadroxil
  • Amikacin in combination with Cefadroxil

To read more about these drugs, you should refer to the RMCA drug chart. Rats are born with mycoplasma which can flare up and cause a respiratory infection. Therefore, it is important to use two antibiotics. One to treat the mycoplasma flare ups and one to treat the bacterial infection. You need to maintain medications for two weeks after the symptoms disappear. Since rats are prey animals, they can hide residual symptoms and you need to make sure you tackle those. Next up is knowing how to give your rat the correct amount of medication. The recommended dosages are listed on the RMCA Drug Chart.

To mix a tablet or capsule into a liquid, a 1 ml syringe or insulin syringe is required to measure out the dosages. Insulin syringes are labeled in units of measurement, with 10 units equaling 0.1 ml. Pick what liquid volume dosage you want to give. For a medicine that might taste bad, it is recommended making the dose 0.1 ml. For medicines that you know your rats will like, you can make the dose 0.3 ml. Using a sweet flavored syrup works well for blending most medicines.

Next, figure out how many dosages there are in the pill. Split up the strength of the tablet or capsule by the required dose. For instance, if a pill holds 250 milligram and the dose is 10 mg/lb, divide 250 by 10. The capsule holds 25 doses for the average 1-lb rat. Grind the tablet or capsule contents to a powder (if it isn’t already a powder). I usually just smash my pills with a cooking pot. This method works will for me. Now to decide on how much liquid to mix, follow the following example:

For example, let’s say you have a 100 mg capsule of doxycycline. Since the dose for doxy is 2.5 mg/lb, this capsule contains 40 doses for the average 1-lb rat. If you decided to make the dose 0.3 ml then you multiply 40 by 0.3 and you get 12 ml. You mix the capsule with 12 ml of flavoring.

Treating the Flu, Chronic Ear Infections, and Other Respiratory Infections

OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATION TREATMENT (OMT) SAVED LIVES DURING THE FLU EPIDEMIC

Before there were antibiotics and flu shots, many people died of flu and other infections. Osteopathic physicians used OMT to help boost the patient’s immune system and to aid the body in fighting off the infection. During the deadly Swine Flu epidemic in the early 1900’s, the death rate for patients of osteopathic physicians who used OMT was much lower than those of MDs.

WHY WE NEED THE OSTEOPATHIC APPROACH TODAY AND HOW IT CAN HELP YOU

As concerns mount about antibiotic-resistant super bugs from the overuse of antibiotics, the threat of pandemics including Swine Flu, the risks of flu shots and the long-term effects of chronic ear and respiratory infections in children, maybe it’s time to learn about the benefits of this effective, century old treatment, call Osteopathic Manipulation Treatment (OMT) used by osteopathic physicians.

ANTIBIOTIC RISKS

One reason why the osteopathic approach can be helpful is that is provides another effective treatment other than antibiotics. There is a great deal of controversy about the over-use of antibiotics for ear and respiratory infections. Because of this over-use, there are now bacteria in the environment that are no longer susceptible to any antibiotic now available. There are no guarantees that the pharmaceutical companies can develop a new, stronger, more broad-spectrum antibiotic for the next generation of resistant bacteria. If we do not turn around this trend, we may find ourselves back in the pre-antibiotic age. Research shows that 80% to 90% of all ear infections heal on their own, and children who do not receive antibiotics actually heal faster and have fewer recurrences. By treating every ear infection with antibiotics, we only succeed at increasing antibiotic-resistant bacteria and prevent the patient from building up his or her own immunity, thus setting the child up for more infections.

WHAT ABOUT THE FLU SHOT?

My patients often ask me if they should get the flu shot. Getting any vaccine should be a personal decision. In Texas, parents have the right to opt out of having their children vaccinated for everything if they so wish. And if they do opt out, the children can still attend school. There are about 17 other states that allow opting out of vaccinations for personal reasons. Other states usually allow opting out for a medical or religious reason. To my knowledge, the flu shot is not required in any state.

I recommend that people thoroughly educate themselves concerning the risks and benefits to getting, or not getting, any vaccines. However, it may be difficult to get all of the information needed to make a good decision about vaccines. If the doctor has received her information from the pharmaceutical company who is selling the vaccine or from another doctor who is working for the company, that information may be biased to help market the product. The news media may also get their information from sources that have a similar bias. So it can be very difficult to decide what to do.

THE SWINE FLU SHOT DEBACLE OF 1976

In 1976, when the last Swine Flu vaccine was made and administered to the American public, it was found that the public did not get the full truth about the potential side effects of the vaccine. More people died of the flu vaccine that year than died of the flu. According to physician and Congressman Ron Paul, the government suspended the use of the vaccine because there were so many deaths. I feel badly for the families of those who died or were injured from the vaccine before that information was known and its use was suspended.

In addition to the deaths, according to Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes, there were 4,000 injuries resulting from taking the Swine Flu vaccine in 1976. Many of those injuries were neurological and permanent.

The government had a similar response to the flu in 1976 as what they are doing now. In 1976 when one soldier died from the flu after he went on a forced march even though he was ill, the rest of the soldiers were tested. Only four were found to have the Swine flu and they all recovered completely without taking a vaccine according to Wallace’s report. Based on this one death, the government called for everyone to take the vaccine. Later the vaccine was withdrawn but much damage had already been done. According to Wallace, the government studies had shown that neurological damage could occur but the government did not warn the public so that they could make an educated choice for themselves. See 60 Minute video at this website.

I think it is important to look at the past to help make decisions in the future. I have to ask the question, if the government kept that information from the public then, could they be doing the same thing now?

It had been reported that this Swine flu of 1976 presented as no worse than a bad cold. If the soldier who died had not gone on the march while ill, would he have died? How do we know that the Swine Flu hasn’t been here every summer, but no one has ever been tested for it? We might have thought it was only a “summer cold”. One of my patients was sent home from camp when she appeared sick and others at the camp had tested positive for flu. She also tested positive for flu, but her mother remarked that she hardly seemed sick at all, more like a cold. At the time of this writing there have been several deaths attributed to the Swine Flu which is now referred to as H1N1.

This year has been interesting because it appeared that the flu was present in some areas, all spring and summer, not just in the winter as the seasonal flu is thought to be. Because of the deaths in Mexico, a red flag went up, that this could be a significant flu. Doctors and public health departments began testing for the Swine Flu. They found it. Many people tested positive, many schools were closed and much fear was expressed. It seemed that for many people though, the Swine Flu was manifesting itself as nothing more than a bad cold. Why did some people die while others had only a bad cold? Could it be that there were differences in the people themselves? Could it be that the ones who died were already sick with something else or were unhealthy to start with or had stressed themselves physically? I would like to know more about the health condition of those who died and those for whom the flu was only a bad cold. As I was writing this, a woman in my community died from Swine Flu. It was reported that she had other medical conditions that may have put her in the position to have a more serious reaction to the Swine Flu virus. I think the health departments should be looking at those differences and informing the public about them. What kinds of illnesses did the people have who died from the virus? I think they should be telling the public how to be as healthy as possible so if we get sick, we are more likely to fully recover. I think they should also be telling us all the potential risks of taking the flu vaccine.

A few years ago, on The Today Show, a couple from Colorado whose son had died from the flu, expressed to the watching public that they regretted not giving their son the flu vaccine. He had died and they were encouraging everyone watching to not make the same mistake they felt they had made. Four children from Colorado had died from influenza that same year.

Someone from the Colorado public health department was also on the show to discuss this issue. Matt Lauer asked the public health official how many children died who had been given the flu vaccine. The health department person replied, “Several.”

If four children died and only one of those four had not been vaccinated, why did they choose the parents of the one child who had not been vaccinated to be interviewed on The Today Show? If three children died who had been vaccinated and only one died who had not been vaccinated, the odds certainly point to not vaccinating, yet the public only heard the plea from the parents who did not vaccinate. Seventy-five percent died who received the vaccine while only 25% died who did not. Why are we not being given that information?

Is the government overreacting and putting fear into everyone over something that may only be a bad cold? The millions who died from the 1918 flu epidemic died mostly from pneumonia that developed secondarily to the flu. There were no antibiotics then as we have now and medical knowledge was very different then as well.

According to Ron Paul, there were 13,000 cases of Tuberculosis (TB) in the US last year alone. Yet no one appears to be panicking about that. Why the scare over an influenza that has not been shown to be much more than a cold for most people?

The virus in each year’s flu vaccine is actually a guess. There is no way to know which strain of influenza will appear each year, so the drug companies have to guess at which ones to put into the vaccines. They put several into each vaccine, so it increases the odds that at least one of the strains that actually appears, will be in the vaccine. As we have seen, there are years when the vaccine just doesn’t seem to be much benefit.

It is important to have a healthy immune system so that when we are exposed to bacteria and viruses our body’s immune system can step in and handle whatever the exposure is.

When my Mother was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer, I knew that the chemotherapy she underwent would lower her immune system and make it harder for her to fight the cancer herself. To offset this, I gave her nutritional IV’s, many oral supplements and even shots of some nutrients. She used visualization to make her immune system stronger. Instead of being dead in 2 months, as was predicted, she was cured of the cancer in 4 months and lived 18 more years without a recurrence of cancer. She continued to take nutritional supplements for the rest of her life, she opted to not take the flu vaccine each year and even though she lived in a retirement facility with many other people, she did not get the flu.

Even though there was a death from Swine Flu in my community, I am not going to get the vaccine myself. I don’t get a flu vaccine for two reasons. First I am concerned about the levels of mercury used. There is still 25 mcg of mercury in the current flu shots. Second, the body’s immune system gets stronger and works better if it has a chance to get sick and recover on its own. I will take nutrients like vitamin C and other anti-oxidants. If I should get the flu, I will use my gentle Osteopathic Manipulation Treatment (OMT) to help get well faster.

HOW OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATION CAN HELP AND WHY I USE IT

I use gentle manipulation modalities that help drain the fluid from the ears, head and neck and enhance the immune system. In my office, I have measured ear fluid with a tympanogram and then treated the patient with manipulation alone. A recheck of the ears, with the tympanogram immediately after the treatment, has revealed some dramatic improvements in fluid levels in the ears.

I teach parents how to do this treatment at home on their children for ear infections. I also recommend that they use it for all respiratory infections and flu as it can be very helpful for children and adults. This is the same type of treatment that osteopathic physicians used in the early 1900’s to treat Swine Flu. It helped save lives.

Asthma Attacks – Can You Stop Or Prevent an Asthma Attack Without Using Drugs?

Although there are several known triggers of asthma, there is only one true cause. The cause is rarely discussed by the mainstream medical community. It was discovered by the leading respiratory doctors over the last century but for some reason the information behind this discovery is not being passed onto asthma sufferers.

The health systems across the world are not too concerned with alternative or home remedies for asthma or for any other affliction for that matter. They are complex systems with many social, economical and political implications. It’s big business! Governments and corporations do not make money from alternative or natural therapies.

It is now accepted amongst the leading respiratory doctors across the world that asthma is merely an imbalance of the respiratory system and not an incurable disease. Many people, especially children do outgrow or become cured of their asthma without realising how they did it. I can explain it!

Asthma is your body’s defence mechanism against involuntary hyperventilation. Once you understand why your body is manifesting asthma or asthmatic symptoms to be more precise, you will be able to prevent and reverse asthmatic symptoms.

An asthma attack is a state which can present itself as various symptoms including: wheezing, breathlessness, coughing, tightness in chest, blocked or runny nose and excessive mucus production.

There are many known triggers of an asthma attack which include, exercise, sleep, extreme weather conditions, laughing, dust, pets, allergens, pollution, smoking or drugs. However, they are simple that, TRIGGERS. They cannot possibly be the cause of asthma, otherwise they would trigger asthma in everybody, right?

Relieving or rescue asthma drugs are solely designed to mask the symptoms of asthma. They will open up your inflamed airways very quickly and provide you instant relief. By doing this, they are actually working against your body’s natural defence mechanism. Whilst they do provide you relief in the moment, they have various side effects and will only make your asthma worst in the long run by creating dependency on rescue drugs to re-open airways, which is something your body is very capable of doing itself.

Preventative drugs are designed to compensate your adrenal glands inability to produce adequate amounts of cortisol. They contain a synthetic version of the natural hormone cortisol called cortisone or corticosteroids. Once again these synthetic drugs have various side effects and with long-term use can affect your body’s ability to manufacture cortisol effectively making your asthma worst.